Gulf Coast Tribune.Com

Constitutional Crisis Social Media Feed.Co

 

 

THIS WEBSITE IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION WHILE BEING UPDATED

 

Fraud on the court is one of the most serious violations that can occur in a court of law.

If fraud on the court occurs, the effect is that the entire case is voided or cancelled and"

Any ruling or judgment that the court  has issued will be void...

 

 The case will usually need to be retried with different court officials,

often in an entirely different venue...

 

For the official who acted in fraud upon the court, they may very well be required to step down from their position and may even be subjected to criminal consequences like a fine or a jail sentence. It could also result in other serious consequences, such as an attorney being disbarred, or a judge being removed from service.

 

If a court official is found to be biased or prejudiced even before fraud occurs, they are required to excuse themselves from the case, and a different official must be appointed. In some jurisdictions, a trial tainted by fraud on the court will be vacated or set aside for a certain time period (such as two years), to be “reopened” at a later date. Fraud on the court can be devastating, especially for a party that may be waiting to receive relief from the court.  Violations of Oath of Office: Violation of Oath of Office is not only grounds for void judgment, but more importantly is grounds, forever barring holding of Judicial Office.” Void Judgments...

 

The Supreme Court ruling law suit states that every American would benefit to know about the sheer fact that exposes corruption and hypocrisy we uphold ignorantly and agree to civil action no. 00-CV-12485-RCL. Fraud on the court is one of the most serious violations that can occur in a court of law. If fraud on the court occurs, the effect is that the entire case is voided or cancelled and" Any ruling or judgment that the court  has issued will be void. 

 

 

The Big Questions Is, What Did Jeff Sessions Really Do To Block Cases and Complaints Being Heard Link To His Affiliates and Their Clients, Violating Constitutional Laws, Enforcement, Consent Orders and More To Cover Up and Continue Money Laundering For Illegal Profits and More To Date.  Sessions Trying To Get His Seat Back This Is Why, So He Can Cover Up The Crimes He Linked To With His Affiliates, He Knew Citizens Were Being Robbed As Well As Govt. Wall Street Investors and More!  

 

Trust Me My Fans Followers and Every Judge Worldwide Know I Got The Crooks That Robbed USA Wrongful Foreclosure Victims Wall Street Investors and More It Hasn't Been Released Yet Because Corla Jackson Had To Bust The Judges First On Fraud Upon The Court Link To The Law Firms That Was Committed The Crimes Link To Jeff Sessions, His Affiliates and More.  They Were Slick Guaranteed!

 

I Got Injured Alone The Way Forcing Them To Leave The Paper Trail Through The Judicial System But I Kept Going On Behalf Of Not Just Myself But For Millions Victims, Wrongful Foreclosure Victims, Govt., Wall Street Investors and More Guaranteed!  I Mainly Kept Going Because Someone Had To Keep Going To Force Them To Leave The Paper Trial Through The Judicial System Which Is, Hard Core Evidence In Writing, On How They Robbed USA Wrongful Foreclosure Victims Wall Street Investors Trust and More! 

 

We Got It Now Guaranteed! Some Of The Pictures That Will Be Posted Will Shock You, As Well As The Evidence In Writing.  Every Lawyer and Judge Nationwide That's  Is Not Corrupted, Need To Pay Attention.  I Know The None Corrupted Lawyers Fighting For Wrongful Foreclosure Victims Government and Wall Street Investors Trust, Were Not Lying, They Were Telling The Truth, But They Needed It In Writing From The Horses Mouth, Because After 2016 Jeff Sessions Blocked Cases From Being Heard and More Link To His Affiliates Guaranteed!  Some People Are Victims and Don't Know How They Were-Are Victims Yet, This Is A Facts Guaranteed!

 

GMAC Mortgage LLC Was No Longer Licensed or Doing Business In Multiple States When The Illegal Orders Were Issued, Its Recorded.  No Judge Could Issue Orders Under A Closed Trust Name Or A Closed Company's Name. No Judge Could Violate The Enforcement and Consent Orders That Were Issued That Prevented Foreclosures Multiple Ways.  The Evidence Speaks For Itself So No One Can Lie, This Is Recorded Facts Guaranteed!  What Judge Dubose Did Was She Corrupted The Federal Judicial System For Her Affiliates Bradley Arant Boult Cummings and Caused Widespread Fraud Upon Other Federal Courts Guaranteed.  See:   3     4 

 

Judge Kristi Dubose Knew Corla Jackson Was Fighting An Illegal Ejectment In Case (CV-2013-902219) Under Judge Johnston and She Helped Judge York Clear Them All By Fraud Upon The Court After They All Were Exposed By Corla Jackson For What They Did To Her Violating Her Civil Rights and Conational Issues and More!

 

 

 

The Supreme Court ruling law suit states that every American would benefit to know about the sheer fact that exposes corruption and hypocrisy we uphold ignorantly and agree to civil action no. 00-CV-12485-RCL. Fraud on the court is one of the most serious violations that can occur in a court of law. If fraud on the court occurs, the effect is that the entire case is voided or cancelled and" Any ruling or judgment that the court  has issued will be void..

 

No man in this country is so high that he is above the law. No officer of the law may set that law at defiance with impunity. All the officers of the government from the highest to the lowest, are creatures of the law, and are bound to obey it.” Butz v. Economou, 98 S.Ct. 2894 (1978); United States v. Lee, 106 U.S. at 220, 1 S.Ct. at 261 (1882).

 

Further it is the obligation of every Judge to honor, abide by, and uphold not only the Constitution and laws of the State, but they are bound by the laws and Constitution of the United States as well.

 

State courts, like federal courts, have a constitutional obligation to safeguard personal liberties and to uphold federal law.” Stone v Powell, 428 US 465, 483 n 35, 96 S. Ct 3037, 49 L Ed. 2d 1067 (1976).

 

Any judge who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United States, wars against that Constitution and engages in violation of the Supreme Law of the Land. If a judge does not fully comply with the Constitution, then his orders are void, In re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (1888), he is without jurisdiction, and he/she has engaged in an act or acts of treason.” U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101 S. Ct. 471, 66 Ed.2d 392, 406 (1980); Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L.Ed 257 (1821)”

 

 

FRAUD UPON COURT : In the United States, when an officer of the court is found to have fraudulently presented facts to court so that the court is impaired in the impartial performance of its legal task, the act, known as "fraud upon the court", is a crime deemed so severe and fundamentally opposed to the operation of justice that it is not subject to any statute of limitation.

Officers of the court include: lawyers, judges, referees, and those appointed; guardian ad litem, parenting time expeditors, mediators, rule 114 neutrals, evaluators, administrators, special appointees, and any others whose influence are part of the judicial mechanism.

Fraud upon the court" has been defined by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals to "embrace that species of fraud which does, or attempts to, defile the court itself, or is a fraud perpetrated by officers of the court so that the judicial machinery can not perform in the usual manner its impartial task of adjudging cases that are presented for adjudication".[6]

In Bulloch v. United States,[7] the court stated "Fraud upon the court is fraud which is directed to the judicial machinery itself and is not fraud between the parties or fraudulent documents, false statements or perjury.... It is where the court or a member is corrupted or influenced or influence is attempted or where the judge has not performed his judicial function—thus where the impartial functions of the court have been directly corrupted.

 

MULTIPLE DAMAGES

1.       As alleged hereinabove, Plaintiff would show that the false, misleading and deceptive acts, practices and/or omissions complained of herein were committed "knowingly" in that Defendants had actual awareness of the falsity, deception, or unfairness of such acts, practices, and/or omissions.

2.       Plaintiff further avers that such acts, practices, and/or omissions were committed "intentionally" in that Defendants specifically intended that Plaintiff act in detrimental reliance on the falsity or deception or in detrimental ignorance of the unfairness.

3.       Therefore, Plaintiff is entitled to recover multiple damages as provided by Title 6, Chapter 11, et. seq., of the Alabama Code.

 

CIVIL CONSPIRACY

4.       Plaintiff would show that Defendants engaged in certain false, misleading and deceptive acts, practices and/or omissions actionable under the Alabama Deceptive Trade Practices - Consumer Protection Act (Alabama Code, Title 8, et seq.), as alleged hereinbelow.  “Alabama recognizes [civil conspiracy] as a substantive tort.” Purcell Co. v. Spriggs Enters., Inc., 431 So. 2d 515, 522 (Ala. 1983). “In essence, civil conspiracy is a combination of two or more persons to do: (a) something that is unlawful; [or] (b) something that is lawful by unlawful means.” Id. See also Eidson v. Olin Corp., 527 So. 2d 1283, 1285 (Ala. 1988). “In a conspiracy, the acts of coconspirators are attributable to each other.” Williams v. Aetna Fin. Co., 83 Ohio St. 3d 464, 476, 1998 Ohio 294, 700 N.E.2d859,868 1998)

 

Discrimination – unfairness – bias – prejudice: Plaintiffs have been discriminated against and treated with unfairness, bias and prejudice by this Court and the opposing counsel. An uninterested, lay person, would question the partiality and neutrality of this Court” Fairness of course requires an absence of actual bias in the trial of cases. But our system of law has always endeavored to prevent even the probability of unfairness.”In re Murchinson, 349 U.S. 133, 136 (1955)”

No man in this country is so high that he is above the law. No officer of the law may set that law at defiance with impunity. All the officers of the government from the highest to the lowest, are creatures of the law, and are bound to obey it.” Butz v. Economou, 98 S.Ct. 2894 (1978); United States v. Lee, 106 U.S. at 220, 1 S.Ct. at 261 (1882)”

Further it is the obligation of every Judge to honor, abide by, and uphold not only the Constitution and laws of the State, but they are bound by the laws and Constitution of the United States as well.”

State courts, like federal courts, have a constitutional obligation to safeguard personal liberties and to uphold federal law.” Stone v Powell, 428 US 465, 483 n 35, 96 S. Ct 3037, 49 L Ed. 2d 1067 (1976)”

Any judge who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United States, wars against that Constitution and engages in violation of the Supreme Law of the Land. If a judge does not fully comply with the Constitution, then his orders are void, In re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (1888), he is without jurisdiction, and he/she has engaged in an act or acts of treason.” U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101 S. Ct. 471, 66 Ed.2d 392, 406 (1980); Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L.Ed 257 (1821)”

 

The Supreme Court ruling law suit states that every American would benefit to know about the sheer fact that exposes corruption and hypocrisy we uphold ignorantly and agree to civil action no. 00-CV-12485-RCL. Fraud on the court is one of the most serious violations that can occur in a court of law. If fraud on the court occurs, the effect is that the entire case is voided or cancelled and" Any ruling or judgment that the court  has issued will be void..

 

Any judge who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United States, wars against that Constitution and engages in violation of the Supreme Law of the Land. If a judge does not fully comply with the Constitution, then his orders are void, In re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (1888), he is without jurisdiction, and he/she has engaged in an act or acts of treason.” U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101 S. Ct. 471, 66 Ed.2d 392, 406 (1980); Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L.Ed 257 (1821)”

 

The distinction between civil and criminal contempt lies in the rights that are being vindicated and the level of willfulness of the conduct: Civil contempt has as its aim the vindication of a private right of a party to litigation and any penalty imposed upon the contemnor is designed to compensate the injured private party for the loss of or interference with that right ( State of New York v. Unique Ideas, 44 N.Y.2d 345, 405 N.Y.S.2d 656, 376 N.E.2d 1301). Criminal contempt, on the other hand, involves vindication of an offense against public justice and is utilized to protect the dignity of the judicial system and to compel respect for its mandates (King v. Barnes, 113 N.Y. 476, 21 N.E. 182). 

 

Inasmuch as the objective is deterrence of disobedience of judicial mandates, the penalty imposed is punitive in nature (State of New York v. Unique Ideas, supra). Although the line between the two types of contempt may be difficult to draw in a given case, and the same act may be punishable as both a civil and a criminal contempt, the element which serves to elevate a contempt from civil to criminal is the level of willfulness with which the conduct is carried out (compare Judiciary Law, § 753, subd. A, par. 3 [civil contempt], with id., § 750, subd. A, par. 3 [criminal contempt]; see, e.g., Sentry ArmoredCourier Corp. v. New York City Off-Track Betting Corp., 75 A.D.2d 344, 429 N.Y.S.2d 902). McCormick v. Axelrod, 453 N.E.2d 508, 512 (N.Y.), amended by, 454 N.E.2d

 

 

Fraud on the court is one of the most serious violations that can occur in a court of law.

If fraud on the court occurs, the effect is that the entire case is voided or cancelled and"

Any ruling or judgment that the court  has issued will be void...

 

 The case will usually need to be retried with different court officials,

often in an entirely different venue...

 

For the official who acted in fraud upon the court, they may very well be required to step down from their position and may even be subjected to criminal consequences like a fine or a jail sentence. It could also result in other serious consequences, such as an attorney being disbarred, or a judge being removed from service.

 

If a court official is found to be biased or prejudiced even before fraud occurs, they are required to excuse themselves from the case, and a different official must be appointed. In some jurisdictions, a trial tainted by fraud on the court will be vacated or set aside for a certain time period (such as two years), to be “reopened” at a later date. Fraud on the court can be devastating, especially for a party that may be waiting to receive relief from the court.  Violations of Oath of Office: Violation of Oath of Office is not only grounds for void judgment, but more importantly is grounds, forever barring holding of Judicial Office.” Void Judgments...

 

 

Discrimination – unfairness – bias – prejudice: Plaintiffs have been discriminated against and treated with unfairness, bias and prejudice by this Court and the opposing counsel. An uninterested, lay person, would question the partiality and neutrality of this Court” Fairness of course requires an absence of actual bias in the trial of cases. But our system of law has always endeavored to prevent even the probability of unfairness.”In re Murchinson, 349 U.S. 133, 136 (1955). 

No man in this country is so high that he is above the law.  No officer of the law may set that law at defiance with impunity. All the officers of the government from the highest to the lowest, are creatures of the law, and are bound to obey it.” Butz v. Economou, 98 S.Ct. 2894 (1978); United States v. Lee, 106 U.S. at 220, 1 S.Ct. at 261 (1882).  Further it is the obligation of every Judge to honor, abide by, and uphold not only the Constitution and laws of the State, but they are bound by the laws and Constitution of the United States as well.   Any judge who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United States, wars against that Constitution and engages in violation of the Supreme Law of the Land. If a judge does not fully comply with the Constitution, then his orders are void, In re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (1888), he is without jurisdiction, and he/she has engaged in an act or acts of treason.” U.S. v. Will, 449 U.S. 200, 216, 101 S. Ct. 471, 66 Ed.2d 392, 406 (1980); Cohens v. Virginia, 19 U.S. (6 Wheat) 264, 404, 5 L.Ed 257 (1821).

 

 

FRAUD UPON COURT

STATEMENT OF FACTS AND OVERVIEW

 

GMAC Mortgage Corporation aka GMAC Mortgage LLC Was Closed When The Illegal Orders That Was Issued After 2.15.2013 Which Is Null & Void By The Rule Of Law!

 

What Judge Dubose Did Was She Blocked Corla Jackson Complaint From Being Heard In Federal Court's Demand By Jury Trial Based Upon Fraud Upon Her Court.  After GMAC Mortgage Was Closed She Went Back and Gave GMAC Mortgage LLC the Case Illegally Prior To Her Case Being Heard Demand By Jury Trial In Federal Courts, Using Deceptive Practices Which Is A Federal Crime Committed By Judge Dubose.

 

Judge Dubose Violated Federal Rules and Procedures For Her Affiliates Bradley Arant Boult Cummings Using Deceptive Practices Which Was Bipartisan It Was A Hate Crime Because Corla Jackson Exposed Her and The Truth Guaranteed!  They Retaliated With Illegal Orders Based Upon Fraud Upon Courts Guaranteed, Its Recorded!   

 

GMAC Mortgage LLC Was No Longer Licensed or Doing Business In Multiple States When The Illegal Orders Were Issued, Its Recorded.  No Judge Could Issue Orders Under A Closed Trust Name Or A Closed Company's Name. No Judge Could Violate The Enforcement and Consent Orders That Were Issued That Prevented Foreclosures Multiple Ways.  The Evidence Speaks For Itself So No One Can Lie, This Is Recorded Facts Guaranteed!  What Judge Dubose Did Was She Corrupted The Federal Judicial System For Her Affiliates Bradley Arant Boult Cummings and Caused Widespread Fraud Upon Other Federal Courts Guaranteed.  See:   3     4 

 

Judge York Is Busted As Well, He Committed Fraud Upon The Court Because He Didn't Have A Summary Judgment Linked To This Crime Initially In Mobile County District Court That He Helped Bradley Arant Boult Cummings and the State Of Alabama Steal by Creating Case (DV-2012-902644) That His Affiliates Loss While He Was Out Of His Office.  Judge York Knew There Was No Due Process and He Knew Bradley Arant Boult Cummings Affiliate Firms Had Committed A Crime That He Needed To Help Them Cover Up Because He To Was Involved In This Crime From The Very Beginning, This Is Why He Went Back and Committed Fraud Upon The Court In Case (CV-2013-902219). 

 

Judge York Went From Bad Corrupting To RICO Violations Which Is A Federal Crime, He Didn't Recuse Himself From The Case He Was Involved In That Caused The Damages Initially Without A Valid Summary Judgment, Prior To (February 22, 2017) That He Was Involved In, In Another Court. 

 

Judge York Followed The Case To Issue An Illegal Order For Himself As Well As For His Affiliates Under, GMAC Mortgage LLC After They Closed and Was No Longer Licensed To Do Business In Alabama, Georgia and More.  Judge York Clearly Committed Civil Fraud Upon The Court Guaranteed!

 

 

GMAC Mortgage LLC didn't Own The Mortgage When He Issued The Illegal Orders, Not To Mention GMAC Mortgage Was Closed and No Longer Licensed To Do Business In Multiple States, Including Alabama and Georgia! 

Judge York Willfully Corrupted This Case Lying and Committed Fraud Upon The Court So He Wouldn't Get Busted As Well As His Alabama Affiliates, Law Firms and Judges Linked To This Crime That He Initiated With His Affiliates Bradley Arant Boult Cummings and Their Affiliate Firms Violating Federal Enforcement Orders, CFPB Consent Orders, Due Process and More. 

 

Judge York Knew Judge Johnston and His Court In Case (DV-2012-902844) Didn't Have A Valid Summary Judgment or Remand From The United States District Court For The Southern Division Of Alabama Prior To OCWEN'S Purchase (February 15, 2013).

 

Judge York Knew He Lied Prior To Issuing His Illegal Orders To Retaliate Against Corla Jackson For Exposing Him and His Affiliates, Which Included Judge Kristi Dubose and Bradley Arant Boult Cummings and More!

 

GMAC Mortgage LLC Was Closed and No Longer Doing Business When He Issued His Illegal Orders (February 22, 2017) and Its Recorded.  Judge York Was Money Laundering  With Illegal Orders For Bradley Arant Boult Cummings and Their Affiliate Firms For Personal Gain and More. 

 

Judge York Knew He Committed Perjury When He Issued The Orders Corrupting Case (CV-2013-902219) That Caused Massive Damages The State Of Alabama Covered UP! 

 

 

FACTS: Judge York Knew Judge Johnston and His Court In Case (DV-2012-902844) Didn't Have A Valid Summary Judgment or Remand From The United States District Court For The Southern Division Of Alabama Prior To OCWEN'S Purchase (February 15, 2013).  The Evidence Speaks For Itself Guaranteed.

 

Judge York Knew From The Very Beginning He Was Involved In The Original Case and Could Not Be Over The Ejectment Issues He Violated and More, GMAC Mortgage LLC Initial Eviction Complaint, They Had Violated The Stayed Order Issued By The United States District Court For The Southern Division Of Alabama In Case (12-00111) Because They Said Judge York Was Going To Help Them But It Backfired.

 

Judge York Went Back To Corrupt Case (CV-2013-902219) To Cover Up The Crime They All Committed Dated Back To GMAC Mortgage LLC Illegal Complaint In Case (12-00111) Was Without A Remand, Summary Judgment, Due Process, Reconveyance and More Prior To The Illegal Wrongful Foreclosure.  Judge York Didn't Recuse Himself He Was Involved! You Have To See This To Believe It!  Alabama Didn't Want The Public To See This Guaranteed.  See Case (DV-2012-902844).  Judge York Is Involved With The Crime That Lead To Widespread Fraud Upon Federal Courts, With Bradley Arant Boult Cummings and Their Affiliate Firms and Lawyers Guaranteed! 

 

Kristi Dubose Committed Fraud Upon The Court and Lied So Bad To Help Bradley Arant Boult Cummings That It Lead To Corla Jackson's Damage Claim Being Dismissed Prior To Her Demand By Jury Trial In The United States District Court For The Southern Division Of Alabama Under Judge Kristi Dubose and She Knew This and Covered It Up!

 

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings Said Martin Glenn Was Issuing Illegal Orders Outside Jurisdiction Giving Them Victims Damage Claim Cases-Prior To Illegal Evictions and Ejectments, By Blocking Victims Complaints From Being Heard.  Martin Glenn Did Not Release State Damage Claims Just Like That, He Was Defrauded by Judge York and Judge Johnstons's Illegal Actions Using Deceptive Practices In Case (DV-2012-902844) and  (CV-2013-902219).  Judge Johnston Didn't Have A Summary Judgment or Remand and Neither Did Judge York or Judge York Initially In Cases (DV-2012-902844)  and  (CV-2013-902219) Prior To OCWEN'S Purchase (February 15, 2013). The Consent Orders and Federal Enforcement Orders That Was Suppose To Protect Corla Jackson Were All Violated Here Its Recorded! 

 

Judge York and Judge Kristi Dubose Orders Is Under (GMAC Mortgage LLC vs. Corla Jackson) vs. The Other Way Around (Corla Jackson vs. GMAC Mortgage Corporation ET, AL.) As Titled In Her Motion She Filed (January 18, 2012) Which Was Covered Up And Ignored.  Corla Jackson Never Had Her Demand by Jury Trial That She Paid For, Because All The Illegal Orders Issued by Judge Kristi Dubose and Judge York-Judge Johnston, That Caused Widespread Fraud Upon The Court In This Complaint Which Cannot Be Ignored, Its Recorded Facts Guarantee!

 

The State Of Alabama Went Back and Covered Up A White Collar Crime Robbery Under Judge York and Judge Dubose Is What They Did To Avoid Paying Jackson Robbing Her Of Everything She Had In A Hate Crime Retaliation For Exposing Them Its Recorded and More Guaranteed!  Corla Jackson Was Suppose To Be Protected Under The Whistleblowers Laws-Act, Which Is Apart Of The Constitution Of The United States! The Judges Linked To This Case Committed Fraud Upon The Court and Its All Recorded In Black and White Guaranteed!

 

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings Placed Judge York Over Their Cases In Corruption That Lead To Widespread Fraud Upon Courts, with Judge Kristi Dubose Help To Avoid The State Damage Claims For Their Affiliates Guaranteed! 

 

Judge Kristi Dubose Helped Judge York Go Back And Carry Out The Crime So They All Would Be Saved By The Illegal Orders Judge York Issued, Knowing This Case Was Related To The Initial Complaint Without Corla Jackson Having Due Process and Her Demand by Jury Trial Prior To The Wrongful Foreclosure, On A Complaint That Was Stayed and Violated By Bradley Arant Boult Cummings and Their Affiliate Firms, Its Recorded! 

 

Judge Kristi Dubose Knew Corla Jackson Was Fighting An Illegal Ejectment In Case (CV-2013-902219) Under Judge Johnston and She Helped Judge York Clear Them All By Fraud Upon The Court After They All Were Exposed By Corla Jackson For What They Did To Her Violating Her Civil Rights and Conational Issues and More!

 

 

According To The GOVERNED LAWS under the RICO ACT, Corruption is (Fraud Upon The Court) and more. Fraud Upon The Court is the worse than any corrupted complaint because the Judge Committed the crime and failed to uphold Constitutional Laws period. 

 

Bankruptcy crime is known as bankruptcy fraud, and it is prosecuted under 18 USC 152. The statute makes it a criminal offense

Federal prosecutors can prosecute bankruptcy crimes through sections 152 through 157 of Title 18 of the United States Code.

any creditor to make a false claim against the debtor, or receive property outside the bankruptcy and Bankruptcy Discharge January 20, 2010 from the debtor. They all knew what they were doing at Jackson expense to date in this hate crime corruption conspiracy committing perjury To Date 

During bankruptcy, the court will appoint an trustee to administer the debtor’s estate. 18 USC 153 governs conduct of the trustee. It is a crime for a trustee, custodian, marshal, or any other officer to knowingly and fraudulently appropriate property. It is a criminal offense to embezzle, spend, or transfer any property or secrets, or to destroy any document that is in that person’s charge.

 

The United States Attorney will prosecute bankruptcy fraud using these specific statutes as well as other criminal statutes:

 

·         Perjury. 18 USC 1621. Perjury is punished by a maximum of 5 years in prison.

·         Conspiracy. 18 USC 371. Conspiracy has a maximum 5-year prison sentence (or less if the underlying crime has a lesser penalty, such as a misdemeanor).

·         Wire fraud. 18 USC 1341. This offense has a possible sentence of 20 years in prison, or 30 years with a possible $1,000,000 fine where the offense impacts a financial institution.

·         Mail fraud. 18 USC 1343. Mail fraud has the same penalties as wire fraud.

·         Bank fraud. 18 USC 1344. Bank fraud is a criminal offense with a possible penalty of 30 years imprisonment and $1,000,000 fine.

·         RICO (racketeering). 18 USC 1962. The sentence for a RICO charge can be 20 years incarceration.

·         Finally, 18 USC 157 prohibits any scheme to defraud another, or attempt, during bankruptcy. The sentence for this charge is a maximum 5 years in federal prison. 

It is illegal to knowingly and with intent to defraud, file a bankruptcy petition or other document, or make a false or fraudulent representation, claim.  18 USC 157 also applies to involuntary bankruptcies. This statute is based on the wire, mail, and bank fraud statutes. See 18 USC 1341, 1343, and 1344, respectively.

 

A defendant can be charged with conspiracy based on statutes within the criminal code

Under 18 USC 371, a person can be charged with conspiracy based on two elements

  1. An agreement to commit a criminal offense.
  2. An overt act that furthers the conspiracy.

The US Attorney does not have to prove that the agreement was in writing. It can be verbal and still subject the parties to criminal liability.

 

(11 U.S.C. § 362 : US Code): 2005 Initial Bankruptcy Case (05-13142)

(d)(4) as to such real property in any prior case under this title, for a period of 2 years after the date of the entry of such an order, except that the debtor, in a subsequent case under this title, may move for relief from such order based upon changed circumstances or for other good cause shown, after notice and a hearing; (21) under subsection (a), of any act to enforce any lien against or security interest in real property - (A) if the debtor is ineligible under section 109(g) to be a debtor in a case under this title; or (B) if the case under this title was filed in violation of a bankruptcy court order in a prior case under this title prohibiting the debtor from being a debtor in another case under this title; (22) subject to subsection (l), under subsection (a)(3), of the continuation of any eviction, unlawful detainer action, or similar proceeding by a lessor against a debtor involving residential property in which the debtor resides as a tenant under a lease or rental agreement and with respect to which the lessor has obtained before the date of the filing of the bankruptcy petition....

 

Sturdivant v. BAC Home Loans, LP, [Ms. 2100245, Dec. 16, 2011] _ So. 3d _ (Ala. Civ. App. 2011). In Sturdivant, BAC Home Loans, LP ("BAC"), initiated foreclosure proceedings on the mortgage encumbering Bessie T. Sturdivant's house before the mortgage had been assigned to BAC.

 

851

False Claims-18 U.S.C. § 152(4)

Subsection (4) of Section 152 sets out the offense of filing a false bankruptcy claim. A "claim" is a document filed in a bankruptcy proceeding by a creditor of the debtor. It is sometimes also called a "proof of claim." For the purposes of this section the nature of the claim is immaterial-- i.e., the claim can be secured or unsecured, liquidated or unliquidated, disputed or undisputed. A "false" claim is one that is known by the creditor to be factually untrue at the time the claim is filed.

 

Subsection (4) provides:

A person who...knowingly and fraudulently presents any false claim for proof against the estate of a debtor, or uses any such claim in any case under title 11, in a personal capacity or as or through an agent, proxy, or attorney;...shall be fined..., imprisoned..., or both.

 

The elements of a false claim violation are:

that bankruptcy proceedings had been commenced;

that defendant presented or caused to be presented a proof of claim in the bankruptcy;

that the proof of claim was false as to a material matter; and

that the defendant knew the proof of claim was false and acted knowingly and fraudulently.

United States v. Overmyer, 867 F.2d 937, 949 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 813 (1989).

 

A claim can be asserted by a creditor whether or not it is reduced to judgment, whether the claim is liquidated, unliquidated, fixed, contingent, mature, unmatured, disputed, undisputed, legal, equitable, secured or unsecured. United States v. Connery, 867 F.2d 929, 934 (reh'g denied)(6th Cir. 1989), appeal after remand 911 F.2d 734 (1990).

 

Since the falsity of a claim, in most cases, is obvious, the key issue frequently becomes what was the defendant's state of mind at the time of the filing of the claim. Good faith is a complete defense to this charge. The filing of a false claim is not a crime where there was a good faith belief in its accuracy. United States v. Connery, 867 F.2d 929, 934 (reh'g denied)(6th Cir. 1989), appeal after remand 911 F.2d 734 (1990).

 

A proof of claim is not false merely because it may be inaccurate or erroneous in any or all respects. The claim may be asserted by a creditor in good faith even though the moneys being sought are thereafter successfully disputed by the debtor or disallowed by the Bankruptcy Court. Instead, a proof of claim is false if the statements contained therein are intentionally inaccurate and submitted without any good faith basis for the claim and are not the result of some mistake or clerical error or inadvertent omission.  United States v. Overmyer, 867 F.2d 937, 950 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 493 U.S. 813 (1989), appeal after remand, 899 F.2d 457 (6th Cir. 1990), cert. denied, 498 U.S. 939 (1990)(quoting above instruction with approval).

Sturdivant v. BAC Home Loans, LP, [Ms. 2100245, Dec. 16, 2011] _ So. 3d _ (Ala. Civ. App. 2011). In Sturdivant, BAC Home Loans, LP ("BAC"), initiated foreclosure proceedings on the mortgage encumbering Bessie T. Sturdivant's house before the mortgage had been assigned to BAC.

 

VIOLATION OF THE DEED OF TRUST ACT (DTA) AND THE CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT !

 

The filing of a bankruptcy petition triggers the automatic stay that halts most pre-petition litigation against a debtor. See 11 U.S.C. §362(a)(1).

The stay does not, however, suspend the commencement or continuation of criminal proceedings against a debtor. See 11 U.S.C. §362(b)(1). 

 

 

 

THE BIG QUESTION IS: Did The Judge Kristi Dubose Know Corla Jackson was trying to Block an Illegal Ejectment under case (CV-2013-902219) without a Summary Judgment, Remand or Corla Jackson Demand by Jury Trial In The United States District Court For The Southern Division Of Alabama in Case (12-00111), the answer is YES!

The key to winning Fraud Upon The Court Cases, the Victims must have knowledge and provide the evidence like this, the Judge knew a Victim was being robbed or fighting to block an Illegal Ejectment, like this!  In This Particular Case Its More Evidence Than Anyone Need On Fraud Upon The Court Because Its Recorded!

 
• Diversity jurisdiction legal definition of Diversity ... Diversity of Citizenship. A phrase used with reference to the jurisdiction of the federal courts which, under the U.S. Constitution, Art. III, § 2, extends to cases. (a) The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions and matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $75,000, exclusively" which included motions to dismiss" ejectments" unlawful detainers " violations of a prior judge orders" which is all part of the plaintiffs or defendants defense.


• Lower courts cannot make these decisions" in reference to the jurisdiction of the federal courts which, under the U.S. Constitution, Art. III, § 2, extends to cases. (a) The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of all civil actions and matter in controversy exceeds the sum or value of $75,000, exclusively" which included motions to dismiss" ejectments" unlawful detainers " violations of a prior judge orders" which is all part of the plaintiffs or defendants defense on cases that is stayed pending federal damages and trial; on criminal offenses" such as identity theft and theft of property under federal laws.

 

Judge Kristi Dubose did nothing to protect Corla Jackson which is a bigger crime, she covered it up instead so the public could not see what she did and that she knew Corla Jackson was fighting an Illegal Ejectment in case (CV-2013-902219). 

 

 

 

 

THIS IS JUST THE TIP OF THE ICEBERG!

 

OCWEN SHOULD BE SHUT DOWN!

 

 

 

THIS WEBSITE IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION WHILE BEING UPDATED   

 

 

 8         9       10      11     12

 

 

 

 

 

CIVIL CONSPIRACY

1.       Plaintiff would show that Defendants engaged in certain false, misleading and deceptive acts, practices and/or omissions actionable under the Alabama Deceptive Trade Practices - Consumer Protection Act (Alabama Code, Title 8, et seq.), as alleged hereinbelow.  “Alabama recognizes [civil conspiracy] as a substantive tort.” Purcell Co. v. Spriggs Enters., Inc., 431 So. 2d 515, 522 (Ala. 1983). “In essence, civil conspiracy is a combination of two or more persons to do: (a) something that is unlawful; [or] (b) something that is lawful by unlawful means.” Id. See also Eidson v. Olin Corp., 527 So. 2d 1283, 1285 (Ala. 1988). “In a conspiracy, the acts of coconspirators are attributable to each other.” Williams v. Aetna Fin. Co., 83 Ohio St. 3d 464, 476, 1998 Ohio 294, 700 N.E.2d859,868 1998)

 

FRAUD UPON THE COURT

In the United States, when an officer of the court is found to have fraudulently presented facts to court so that the court is impaired in the impartial performance of its legal task, the act, known as "fraud upon the court", is a crime deemed so severe and fundamentally opposed to the operation of justice that it is not subject to any statute of limitation.

Officers of the court include: lawyers, judges, referees, and those appointed; guardian ad litem, parenting time expeditors, mediators, rule 114 neutrals, evaluators, administrators, special appointees, and any others whose influence are part of the judicial mechanism.  Fraud upon the court" has been defined by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals to "embrace that species of fraud which does, or attempts to, defile the court itself, or is a fraud perpetrated by officers of the court so that the judicial machinery can not perform in the usual manner its impartial task of adjudging cases that are presented for adjudication".[6]

In Bulloch v. United States,[7] the court stated "Fraud upon the court is fraud which is directed to the judicial machinery itself and is not fraud between the parties or fraudulent documents, false statements or perjury.... It is where the court or a member is corrupted or influenced or influence is attempted or where the judge has not performed his judicial function—thus where the impartial functions of the court have been directly corrupted.

 

MULTIPLE DAMAGES

1.       As alleged hereinabove, Plaintiff would show that the false, misleading and deceptive acts, practices and/or omissions complained of herein were committed "knowingly" in that Defendants had actual awareness of the falsity, deception, or unfairness of such acts, practices, and/or omissions.

2.       Plaintiff further avers that such acts, practices, and/or omissions were committed "intentionally" in that Defendants specifically intended that Plaintiff act in detrimental reliance on the falsity or deception or in detrimental ignorance of the unfairness.

3.       Therefore, Plaintiff is entitled to recover multiple damages as provided by Title 6, Chapter 11, et. seq., of the Alabama Code.

 

Judge George N. Bowden of the Superior Court in Washington State ruled against Bank of America (BoA) in a foreclosure battle that ended with the nonjudicial foreclosure sale under the Deed of Trust Act (DTA). The sale was deemed void, and the court is setting the foreclosure aside.

 

Sturdivant v. BAC Home Loans, LP, [Ms. 2100245, Dec. 16, 2011] _ So. 3d _ (Ala. Civ. App. 2011). In Sturdivant, BAC Home Loans, LP ("BAC"), initiated foreclosure proceedings on the mortgage encumbering Bessie T. Sturdivant's house before the mortgage had been assigned to BAC.

 

 

GMAC Mortgage LLC Was No Longer Licensed or Doing Business In Multiple States When The Illegal Orders Were Issued, Its Recorded.  No Judge Could Issue Orders Under A Closed Trust Name Or A Closed Company's Name. No Judge Could Violate The Enforcement and Consent Orders That Were Issued That Prevented Foreclosures Multiple Ways.  The Evidence Speaks For Itself So No One Can Lie, This Is Recorded Facts Guaranteed!  What Judge Dubose Did Was She Corrupted The Federal Judicial System For Her Affiliates Bradley Arant Boult Cummings and Caused Widespread Fraud Upon Other Federal Courts Guaranteed.  See:   3     4 

 

 

Judge Kristi Dubose Knew Corla Jackson Was Fighting An Illegal Ejectment In Case (CV-2013-902219) Under Judge Johnston and She Helped Judge York Clear Them All By Fraud Upon The Court After They All Were Exposed By Corla Jackson For What They Did To Her Violating Her Civil Rights and Conational Issues and More!

 

 

READ MORE 

 

    

 

See Evidence    1      2      3      4      5     6     7      8      9    10   11    12    13

 

 

 

THIS WEBSITE IS UNDER CONSTRUCTION WHILE BEING UPDATED   

 

 

 8         9       10      11     12

 

 

Continue